
In this weeks posting, I decided to follow up on a subject that is happening fairly commonly today. The evolution of corporate logos is a subject, which gets little attention and relates well with art and identity of self. At the bottom of this post is a web link, which analyzes various well-known logos and gives brief history of the company and logo. This post is intended not to look into the various companies changing their logos but to analyze he importance of changing the logo. The logo is the visual representation of a company and perhaps he first thing people notice about a company. The design and color scheme are all selected according to some type of realization that can vary. Do these logo’s attract consumers? Do these logo’s create the illusion of friendliness? Do these logo’s represent the company a whole, a product or an idea? These questions have multiple answers depending on the company being analyzed, however it is important, in my opinion, to note the significance of logo changes. For example, perhaps the most recent known design change was Pepsi’s brand logo update. The Pepsi Company has been linked to the logo for decades, however, the company decided to change the logo. When a company changes its logo, it must put in a ton of effort and thought into its final design because although only good intentions are to come from the new design, a consumer backlash can result in response to the change such as consumer dependency on tradition or confusion. The new Pepsi logo didn’t change much as the color palette is still there, but some minor changes were done to the design that has received various types of criticism. Sometimes a company changes its logo because of a traditional logo becoming outdated in relation to current times, but the main question that I would like to see some answers to in the comments are to why consumers feel the need to push or rely heavily on a particular logo for years or even decide to change.
http://www.neatorama.com/2008/02/07/the-evolution-of-tech-companies-logos/